![]() ![]() ![]() PewDiePie said that selectively restricting him from producing content related to Firewatch violates the website’s own policy. It doesn’t hurt to let us know on Twitter when you’re live. You are free to monetize your videos as well. We love that people stream and share their experiences in the game. PewDiePie pointed out that the website for Firewatch gives people their blessing to livestream the game. PewDiePie also linked to a podcast on Head Gum as a counterpoint to the argument that Let’s Plays are protected by Fair Use. “Rather, it gives PewDiePie a lot more leverage to claim that any such takedown would be abusive, and possibly even a violation of the DMCA’s 512(f) against misrepresentations.” “The fact that Vanaman directly and publicly admits that he’s not taking the video down for any valid copyright reason, but rather because he thinks PewDiePie is “a propagator of despicable garbage” doesn’t help Vanaman’s case at all,” Masnick said. He cited an article on Tech Dirt by Mike Masnick saying that the video would be protected by fair use. PewDiePie added that he was most certain that his video was protected under fair use and that legal experts could agree. YouTubers like PewDiePie don’t own the game, but Let’s Plays could fall under Fair Use as there’s often editing, voice work and other things involved to make the video their own. He said that Let’s Plays, the main wheelhouse of his channel in which he commentates on footage of him playing a game, is a gray area legally. Pewdiepie, aka Felix Kjellberg, said that the copyright strike was an attack on him and his livelihood. However, he did point out that the copyright strike was largely spurious. He said that he will not pursue the issue further in court even though his case would be strong because he didn’t want to waste anyone’s time and money and he recognizes that it was his fault for saying the racial slur. However, you can see the same video reuploaded by another YouTuber below:Īfter apologizing for the racial slur earlier this week, PewDiePie responded to the DMCA takedown in a recent update video. But after he received the takedown, he deleted the video entirely. PewDiePie’s Firewatch playthrough has been made private by PewDiePie himself out of respect for Vanaman’s request. Then either the claim is taken to court or the people who issued the strike exhaust the 14 day limit on refuting counter claims and the video is put back up. If a YouTuber receives three strikes, their channel is shut down completely. The video gets taken down and the YouTuber’s ability to monetize videos may be affected. Vanaman added that he is “sick of this child getting more and more chances to make money off of what we make,” and that PewDiePie is “worse than a closeted racist: he’s a propagator of despicable garbage that does real damage to the culture around this industry.” He also urged other developers to do the same and he will “be reaching out to folks much larger than us to cut him off from the content that has made him a millionaire.” He acknowledged that the 5.7 million views for PewDiePie’s Firewatch playthrough may have lead to increased sales of the game, and reassured his love of streamers saying he gave away 3,000 copies of the game to both professional and amateur streamers.Ī DMCA-style copyright strike is when a company strikes a YouTube video because they feel it infringes on their copyright. We're filing a DMCA takedown of PewDiePie's Firewatch content and any future Campo Santo games. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |